Problem 1 Define the sequence of such that
for
and
for all
. Find all
such that the equation
has no solutions in
.
Problem 2 Let be a set of
boys: they play with each other in a tournament of Pro Evolution Soccer 2009, in respect of the following rules:
i) every boy play one and only one time against each other boy (so we can assume that every match has the form for some
);
ii) if the match , with
, ends with the win of the boy
, then
gains
point, and
doesn’t gain any point;
iii) if the match , with
, ends with the parity of the two boys, then
point is assigned to both boys.
(We assume for simplicity that in the imaginary match the boy
doesn’t gain any point).
Show that for some positive integer there exist a set of boys
such that, for all choice of the positive integer
, the boy
gains always a integer number of points in the total of the matches
.
Problem 3 Define for all
, where
.
Let fixed; show that exist infinitely many
such that
.
Problem 4 Let be a permutation of
.
If we know that is not monic, show that if exist
such that
then
.
Problem 5 Let fixed. Show that exist infinitely many
such that
.
Problem 6. Let be the Lucas sequence defined by
for all
. Show that every odd divisor of
has a even tens digit. (by Gebegb)
Problem 7. Let fixed, and define
, and let a real
fixed. Show that
holds definitively.
Solution. We can begin noting that the infinite sequence of positive integers defined by
for all
verify the divisibility relation
. Easily by PMI, if
for all
, then
. On the other hand it is also true that the infinite sequence of positive integer
defined by
verify the divisibility relation too, infact
, and again by PMI, if
for all
then
. So it is enough to show that
, that is true since in
we have
.
We can show now that only the sequences and
have only a finite number of common elements: in fact if
for some
then
, but it is well known the equation
has only finitely many solution in
, since by the Lifting Lemma
, but
, that is false definitively (it can be seen also as a corollary of Mihailescu Theorem).
Obviusly both sequences are strictly increasing, so it is true that each sequences have at least respectively and
elements that are not greater than
, so
definitively.
About the upper bound, it is equivalent to show that .
Note that for all
, so that
. Now if
then
for all
sufficiently large. It means that
, and also that if
then
. So, in the set
there are at most
numbers multiple of
.
Let fixed and define
. Clearly we have that
for some positive real
fixed.
It is enough to conclude since
, but if
is sufficiently large, then both limits can be arbitrary small. []
Problem 8. Let a convex quadrilateral fixed such that
,
. Define
the midpoint of
; show that
Solution . X in BE such that CXE=CDE so DECX cyclic so DXE=DCE=180-CDA-CAD=180-CAB-CAD=180-BAD, so ABXD cyclic so BDA=AXB=CXE=CDE.
Problem 9. Find all such that
.
Solution. 2 doesn’t divide f(x):= x³ – 5x + 17 that is integer, so min{y,z}>-1 and y = 0. If there are no solutions, so
Now
in
so we have the only case
. So
must be a cube, but
for all
.
Problem 10. Define the function such that
if
, and
otherwise. Define the function
such that
for all
. Define also the sequence of integers
such that
e
, where
if
, and
otherwise. How many distinct elements are in the set
?
Solution. Consider the obvious bijection between {1,…,2048} and the strings of 11 binary digits. The problem states that we begin with , and that if
or
(where
is a string of 10 binary digits) then
if we can find i<n+1 such that
, otherwise
. Define
and
. Suppose that
for some e in {0,1} and a string y of 10 binary digits, then
by definition of k, so define
the other i such that 1<i<k+1. And, if
then define j that integer such that 0<j<k+1 and
(it must exist since
). If j>1 then
exist and is
, then
, contradiction, so j=1. It means that $latex y=0 \in S$, and if
then
, contradiction, so
. Clearly
; suppose that
. A number
and a string
of 10 binary digits exist such that
, and suppose
(clearly
).Define
for some 1<w<k+1, then there exist 0<z<k+1 such that $x_z = b1 \in S$. As before if z>1 then
exist and is
, contradiction; and if z=1 then b=0, again contradiction. So a number
does not belong to S only if
. But in this way we can define a sequence of number that do not belong to S, and that is eventually null, but
.
It shows that .[]
Problem 11. Let be two positive integer fixed such that
. Evaluate
.
Solution. It is equivalent to search the minimum positive integer integer n such that and
have the same number of digit in base
. Working in base
, if
then
, so the max “report” when we compute
in the leftmost place is 1.And trivially
need to have at least
digits. So the minimum integer is
.[]
Problem 12. (a) Let positive integer such that
. Show that
for infinitely many positive integer
. (Laurentiu Panaitopol,TST Romania1987)
(b) Show that there exist infinitely many triple of positive integers such that
and
and
for infinitely many positive integer
. (Me)
Solution. (a) Since is a symmetric polynomial, it can be written in terms of
,
and
(see the fundamental theorem of symmetric function). Now since
by assumption, if
is made only by monomial of the form
, then it has a degree multiple of 3. But
.
(b) There exist infinitely many primes such that
(in fact, if this set is finite and P is the product of its elements, then
should have only prime divisor of the form
but it is false since
for all prime
such that
; in all way, it is a corollary of Dirichlet theorem). Set
and
then
; it means that if
and
then
for some integer
(in fact
takes a complete residue system in
and
does not work). Define
this integer, so
and
for infinitely many positive integer
. This is true, since it is enough to take
and by Euler criterion we have
in
. But a sum of odd number of odd addends is odd, and in particulat it is non null.[]
Problema 13. Fix a strictly increasing sequence of such that ten n-th terms is not bigger than nx+y definitively for some
. Show that
.
Solution. By contradiction if is set of prime divisor of
and
then we’ll have that
definitively, that is clearly a contradiction. []
Problem 14. Prove that in the set there are
elements such that any three of them are not in arithmetic progression.
Problem 15. Let be integers such that
; is $500 < a_1$ (always) true ?
Solution. It is enough to show that if we have distinct positive integers s.t. noone divides another one, so the smallest element is at least
. Let
be the
adic valuation of
, so naturally there exist a bijective function from
to
, where
. Consider the numbers s.t.
: if
and
we have contradiction: it follows that
, so the only number
with
has the property that
. Now it is enough to prove that
, but it is quite easy considering the number in the form
and using similar tecnique as above.
Problem 16. Let fixed and let
be three polynomial such that
. Show that the equation
has only a finite number of solutions, where
denotes the sum of digit of a positive integer
.
Problem 17. Let fixed such that
and fix also non constant polynomials
for each
. Now define the function
and
such that
if
appears in the decimal representation of
, otherwise
.
Show that it does not exist a non-zero polynomial such that for all
the equation :
holds.