Bboyjordan's Blog

04/11/2009

A list of own problems

Filed under: Own Problems — bboyjordan @ 5:38 PM

Problem 1 Define the sequence of \{x_i\}_{i \in \mathbb{N}_0} such that x_i = i for i \in \{1,2,3\} and \displaystyle x_{n + 3} = \frac {x_{n + 2}^{5} + x_n^2}{ x_{n + 1}^{ 3}} for all n \in \mathbb{N}_0. Find all m \in \mathbb{N}_0 such that the equation \displaystyle x_m = \frac{a^{3} + b^{7}}{c^{13}+d^{17}} has no solutions in (a,b,c,d) \in \mathbb{Z}^4.

Problem 2 Let X: = \{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_{29}\} be a set of 29 boys: they play with each other in a tournament of Pro Evolution Soccer 2009, in respect of the following rules:
i) every boy play one and only one time against each other boy (so we can assume that every match has the form (x_i \text{ Vs } x_j) for some i \neq j);
ii) if the match (x_i \text{ Vs } x_j), with i \neq j, ends with the win of the boy x_i, then x_i gains 1 point, and x_j doesn’t gain any point;
iii) if the match (x_i \text{ Vs } x_j), with i \neq j, ends with the parity of the two boys, then \frac {1}{2} point is assigned to both boys.
(We assume for simplicity that in the imaginary match (x_i \text{ Vs } x_i) the boy x_i doesn’t gain any point).
Show that for some positive integer k \le 29 there exist a set of boys \{x_{t_1},x_{t_2},\ldots,x_{t_k}\} \subseteq X such that, for all choice of the positive integer i \le 29, the boy x_i gains always a integer number of points in the total of the matches \{(x_i \text{ Vs } x_{t_1}),(x_i \text{ Vs } x_{t_2}),\ldots, (x_i \text{ Vs } x_{t_k})\}.

Problem 3 Define \displaystyle \Phi_n(x):=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}{x^i} for all n \in \mathbb{N}_0, where \mathbb{N}_0:=\mathbb{N} \setminus \{0\}.
Let a \in \mathbb{N} \setminus \{0,1\} fixed; show that exist infinitely many n \in \mathbb{N}_0 such that \displaystyle \text{gpf}(\Phi_n(a))>n\log_a{n}.

Problem 4 Let \{\sigma(1), \sigma(3), \sigma(5),..., \sigma(2009)\} be a permutation of \{1,3,5,\ldots,2009\}.
If we know that \displaystyle P(x)=\sum_{i=0}^{1004}{(-1)^i\sigma(2i+1)x^{2i}} is not monic, show that if exist \alpha \in \mathbb{R} such that P(\alpha)=0 then \alpha+29>0.

Problem 5 Let a \in \mathbb{N} \setminus \{0,1\} \text{ and } b \in \mathbb{N}_0 fixed. Show that exist infinitely many n \in \mathbb{N}_0 such that \displaystyle \log_a{(\text{gpf}^b(\Phi_n(a)))}<n.

Problem 6. Let \{L_i\}_{i \in \mathbb{N}} be the Lucas sequence defined by L_0=L_1+1=2 \text{ and } L_{n+2}=L_n+L_{n+1} for all n \in \mathbb{N}. Show that every odd divisor of L_{2n} has a even tens digit. (by Gebegb)

 Problem 7. Let n \in \mathbb{N}_0 fixed, and define s(n): = \{x \in \mathbb{Z}: 1 \le x \le n \text{ and } x \mid 2^x + 1\}, and let a real k > 0 fixed. Show that 2\ln(n) < |s(n)| < kn holds definitively.

Solution. We can begin noting that the infinite sequence of positive integers \{x_i\}_{i \in \mathbb{N}} defined by x_0:=1,x_{n+1}:=2^{x_n}+1 for all n \in \mathbb{N} verify the divisibility relation x_n \mid 2^{x_n}+1. Easily by PMI, if x_i \mid 2^{x_i}+1 for all i<n, then \displaystyle 2^{x_n}+1=2^{2^{x_{n-1}}+1}+1=\left(2^{\frac{2^{x_{n-1}}+1}{x_{n-1}}}\right)^{x_{n-1}}+1 \text{ } \vdots \text{ } 2^{x_{n-1}}+1=x_n. On the other hand it is also true that the infinite sequence of positive integer \{y_i\}_{i \in \mathbb{N}} defined by y_i:=3^i verify the divisibility relation too, infact 1=y_0 \mid 2^{y_0}+1, and again by PMI, if y_i \mid 2^{y_i}+1 for all i<n then \displaystyle y_n=3y_{n-1} \mid 2^{3y_{n-1}}+1=\left(2^{y_{n-1}}+1\right)\phi_3(-2^{y_{n-1}}). So it is enough to show that \displaystyle 2^{2 \cdot 3^{n-1}}-2^{3^{n-1}}+1 \text{ }\vdots \text{ }3, that is true since in \mathbb{F}_3 we have 4^{3^{n-1}}-2^{3^{n-1}}+1=1-(-1)+1=0.

We can show now that only the sequences \{x_i\}_{i \in \mathbb{N}} and \{y_i\}_{i \in \mathbb{N}} have only a finite number of common elements: in fact if x_a=y_b for some (a,b) \in \mathbb{N}^2 then 2^{x_{a-1}}+1=3^b, but it is well known the equation 2^x+1=3^y has only finitely many solution in \mathbb{N}, since by the Lifting Lemma y=\upsilon_3(3^y)=\upsilon_3(2^x+1)=\upsilon_3(x)+1, but 2^x<2^x+1=3^y<4^{1+\upsilon_3(x)}<2^{2+2\ln(x)}, that is false definitively (it can be seen also as a corollary of Mihailescu Theorem).

Obviusly both sequences are strictly increasing, so it is true that each sequences have at least respectively \lfloor \text{log}_{2,1}(n) \rfloor and \lfloor \text{log}_3(n) \rfloor elements that are not greater than n, so |s(n)|> \lfloor \text{log}_{2,1}(n) \rfloor+\lfloor \text{log}_3(n) \rfloor > 2 \ln(n) definitively.

About the upper bound, it is equivalent to show that \displaystyle \lim_{n \to +\infty}{\frac{|s(n)|}{n}}=0.

Note that p \mid 2^{pk}-2^k for all (p,k) \in \mathbb{P} \times \mathbb{N}, so that \text{ord}_p(2)=\text{ord}_p(2^p). Now if p \mid 2^t \pm1 then 2^t \ge p \mp 1 \ge 2^{\ln(p)} for all p \in \mathbb{P} sufficiently large. It means that \text{ord}_p(2) \ge \ln(p), and also that if p \mid x \in s(n) then x \ge \ln(p). So, in the set s(n) there are at most \displaystyle n\left(p\ln(p)\right)^{-1} numbers multiple of p.

Let q \in \mathbb{P} fixed and define \displaystyle r_q(n):=\{x \in \mathbb{N}: 1\le x \le n \text{ and gpf}(x)<q\}. Clearly we have that \displaystyle \ell\left(\ln(n)\right)^q < | r_q(n) | for some positive real \ell fixed.

It is enough to conclude since \displaystyle \lim_{n \to +\infty}{\frac{|s(n)|}{n}} \le \lim_{n \to +\infty}{\frac{|r_q(n)|+\sum_{q \le p \in \mathbb{P}}{n\left(p\ln(p)\right)^{-1}}}{n}} \displaystyle \le \lim_{n \to +\infty}{\ell \frac{\left( \ln(n) \right)^q}{n}}+\lim_{n \to +\infty}{\sum_{q \le p \in \mathbb{P}}{\left(p\ln(p)\right)^{-1}}} , but if q \in \mathbb{P} is sufficiently large, then both limits can be arbitrary small. []

Problem 8. Let a convex quadrilateral ABCD fixed such that AB = BC, \angle ABC = 80, \angle CDA = 50. Define E the midpoint of AC; show that \angle CDE = \angle BDA

Solution . X in BE such that CXE=CDE so DECX cyclic so DXE=DCE=180-CDA-CAD=180-CAB-CAD=180-BAD, so ABXD cyclic so BDA=AXB=CXE=CDE.

Problem 9. Find all (x,y,z) \in \mathbb{Z}^3 such that x^3 - 5x = 1728^{y}\cdot 1733^z - 17.

Solution. 2 doesn’t divide f(x):= x³ – 5x + 17  that is integer, so min{y,z}>-1 and y = 0. If z = 0  there are no solutions, so f(x) \ge 1733 \implies x > 10 Now f(x) \in \{0,1,3,5,6\} in \mathbb{F}_7 so we have the only case 3 \mid z. So f(x) must be a cube, but (x - 1)^3 < f(x) < x^3 for all x > 10.

Problem 10. Define the function g(\cdot): \mathbb{Z} \to \{0,1\} such that g(n) = 0 if n < 0, and g(n) = 1 otherwise. Define the function f(\cdot): \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z} such that f(n) = n - 1024g(n - 1024) for all n \in \mathbb{Z}. Define also the sequence of integers \{a_i\}_{i \in \mathbb{N}} such that a_0 = 1 e a_{n + 1} = 2f(a_n) + \ell, where \ell = 0 if \displaystyle \prod_{i = 0}^n{\left(2f(a_n) + 1 - a_i\right)} = 0, and \ell = 1 otherwise. How many distinct elements are in the set S: = \{a_0,a_1,\ldots,a_{2009}\}?

Solution. Consider the obvious bijection between {1,…,2048} and the strings of 11 binary digits. The problem states that we begin with x_1: = 1, and that if x_n = 0\ell or x_n = 1\ell (where \ell is a string of 10 binary digits) then x_{n + 1} = \ell 1 if we can find i<n+1 such that x_i = \ell, otherwise x_{n + 1} = \ell 0. Define k: = \max\{n \in \mathbb{N}: \prod_{1 \le a < b \le n}{(x_a - x_b)} \neq 0\} and S: = \{x_1,...,x_k\}. Suppose that x_k = ey for some e in {0,1} and a string y of 10 binary digits, then x_{k + 1} = y0 \in S by definition of k, so define x_i: = y0 \in S the other i such that 1<i<k+1. And, if x_k = ey then define j that integer such that 0<j<k+1 and x_j: = y1 \in S (it must exist since x_{k + 1} = y0). If j>1 then \{x_{i - 1},x_{j - 1}\} exist and is \{0y,1y\}, then x_k \in \{x_{i - 1},x_{j - 1}\}, contradiction, so j=1. It means that $latex y=0 \in S$, and if e = 1 then x_{k - 1} \in \{0,x_k\}, contradiction, so x_k = 0. Clearly 1 \le k \le 2048; suppose that k < 2048. A number a \in \{0,1\} and a string b of 10 binary digits exist such that ab \not \in S, and suppose b0 \in S (clearly b \neq 0).Define x_w: = b0 \in S for some 1<w<k+1, then there exist 0<z<k+1 such that $x_z = b1 \in S$. As before if z>1 then \{x_{w - 1},x_{z - 1}\} exist and is ab \in \{0b,1b\} \subseteq S, contradiction; and if z=1 then b=0, again contradiction. So a number ab does not belong to S only if b0 \not \in S. But in this way we can define a sequence of number that do not belong to S, and that is eventually null, but a_k = 0.
It shows that \prod_{0 \le i < j \le 2047}{(a_i - a_j)^2} > 0.[]

Problem 11.  Let a,b be two positive integer fixed such that b>1. Evaluate \min\{n \in \mathbb{N}_0: \lfloor \text{log}_b(n)+\text{log}_b(b^a+1) \rfloor - \lfloor \text{log}_b(n) \rfloor >a \}.

Solution. It is equivalent to search the minimum positive integer integer n such that nb^{a+1} and n(b^a+1) have the same number of digit in base b \in \mathbb{N} \setminus \{0,1\}. Working in base b, if (x,y) \in \{0,1,2...,,b-1\}^2 then x+y<2b, so the max “report” when we compute nb^a+n in the leftmost place is 1.And trivially n need to have at least a+1 digits. So the minimum integer is n=b^{a+1}-b+1.[]

Problem 12. (a) Let a,b,c positive integer such that a+b+c \mid a^2+b^2+c^2. Show that a+b+c \mid a^n+b^n+c^n for infinitely many positive integer n. (Laurentiu Panaitopol,TST Romania1987)

(b) Show that there exist infinitely many triple of positive integers (a,b,c) such that \text{gcd}(a,b,c)=1 and a+b+c \mid a^2+b^2+c^2 and a+b+c \nmid a^n+b^n+c^n for infinitely many positive integer n. (Me)

 Solution. (a) Since a^n+b^n+c^n is a symmetric polynomial, it can be written in terms of \sigma_1:=a+b+c, \sigma_2:=ab+bc+ca and \sigma_3:=abc (see  the fundamental theorem of symmetric function). Now since \sigma_1 \mid \sigma_2 by assumption, if a^n+b^n+c^n is made only by monomial of the form \sigma_3, then it has a degree multiple of 3. But |\mathbb{N} \setminus 3\mathbb{N}|=+\infty.

(b) There exist infinitely many primes p \in \mathbb{P} such that 6 \mid p-1 (in fact, if this set is finite and P is the product of its elements, then 4P^2+3 should have only prime divisor of the form 6k-1 but it is false since \left(\frac{-3}{q}\right)=-1 for all prime q such that 6 \mid q+1; in all way, it is a corollary of Dirichlet theorem). Set b:=1 and c:=p-(a+1) then p \mid a^2+1+(a+1)^2; it means that if p>2 and 6 \mid p-1 then p \mid (2a+1)^2+3 for some integer a \in \mathbb{Z} \cap [1,p-2] (in fact 2a+1 takes a complete residue system in \{0,1,\ldots,p-1\} and  a \in \{p-1,0\} does not work). Define a_0 this integer, so a_0+1+(p-a_0-1)=p \mid a_0^2+1^2+(p-a_0-1)^2 and p \nmid a_0^n+1^n+(p-a_0-1)^n for infinitely many positive integer n. This is true, since it is enough to take n=k \frac{p-1}{2} and by Euler criterion we have a_0^n+1^n+(p-a_0-1)^n=\left(\frac{a_0}{p}\right)^k+1+\left(\frac{p-a_0-1}{p}\right)^k in \mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}. But a sum of odd number of odd addends is odd, and in particulat it is non null.[]

Problema 13. Fix a strictly increasing sequence of \{a_i\}_{i \in \mathbb{N}}\subseteq \mathbb{N}_0 such that ten n-th terms is not bigger than nx+y definitively for some (x,y) \in (\mathbb{R}^+)^2. Show that \displaystyle \omega\left(\prod_{i \in \mathbb{N}}{a_i}\right)=+\infty.

Solution. By contradiction if S is set of prime divisor of \displaystyle \prod_{i \in \mathbb{N}}{a_i} and   |S|<+\infty then we’ll have that \displaystyle \sum_{i \in \mathbb{N}}{\frac{1}{xi+y}} \displaystyle \le \sum_{i \in \mathbb{N}}{\frac{1}{a_i}} \le \prod_{p \in S}{\left( \sum_{j \in \mathbb{N}}{\frac{1}{p^j} }\right)} definitively, that is clearly a contradiction. []

Problem 14. Prove that in the set S :=\{2008,2009,...,4200\} there are 5^3 elements such that any three of them are not in arithmetic progression.

Problem 15. Let 0<a_1<a_2<a_3<...<a_{10000}<20000 be integers such that \text{gcd}(a_i,a_j) < a_i, \forall i < j ; is $500 < a_1$ (always) true ?

Solution.  It is enough to show that if we have 2n > 3^k distinct positive integers s.t. noone divides another one, so the smallest element is at least 2^k. Let \upsilon_p(x) be the p -adic valuation of x, so naturally there exist a bijective function from \{\frac {a_i}{\upsilon_2(a_i)}\} to \{2i - 1\}, where 1 \le i \le 10^4. Consider the numbers s.t. \upsilon_p(a_i) = 0, \forall p > 3: if \upsilon_2(a_i) \le \upsilon_2(a_j) and \upsilon_3(a_i) \le \upsilon_3(a_j) we have contradiction: it follows that \upsilon_2(a_i) + \upsilon_3(a_i) \ge k, so the only number a_h with \frac {a_h}{2^{\upsilon_2(a_h)}} = 1 has the property that \upsilon_2(a_h) \ge k. Now it is enough to prove that h = 1, but it is quite easy considering the number in the form 2^a3^bp and using similar tecnique as above.

Problem 16. Let (a,b,c)\in \mathbb{N}_0^3 fixed and let p(\cdot),q(\cdot),r(\cdot)\in \mathbb{N}[x] be three polynomial such that \min\{\text{deg}(p(\cdot)),\text{deg}(q(\cdot)),\text{deg}(r(\cdot))\}>0. Show that the equation \displaystyle \pi^a(p(n)) = s^b(q(n)) + \sigma_0^c(r(n)) has only a finite number of solutions, where s(m) denotes the sum of digit of a positive integer m.

Problem 17.  Let (a,b)\in \mathbb{Z}^2 fixed such that \min\{a,b\}\ge 2 and fix also non constant polynomials p_i(\cdot):\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} for each i\in\mathbb{Z}\cap[0,a+4]. Now define the function f_4(\cdot):\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{Z}\cap [0,4):x\to x-4\lfloor x\cdot 4^{ - 1}\rfloor and g_b(\cdot):\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}_0 such that g_b(x)=x^b if b appears in the decimal representation of x, otherwise g_b(x) = b^x.
Show that it does not exist a non-zero polynomial P[x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_{a + 5}]\in\mathbb{R}[x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_{a + 5}] such that for all n\in\mathbb{N}_0 the equation :
\displaystyle P[p_0(\sigma_0(n)),p_1(\sigma_1(n)),\displaystyle \ldots,p_a(\sigma_a(n)),p_{a + 1}(\omega(n)),p_{a + 2}(\varphi(n)),p_{a + 3}(f_4(n)),p_{a + 4}(g_c(n))] = 0 holds.

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.