Bboyjordan's Blog

19/12/2011

List of funny problems (3rd)

Filed under: Mathematical matters — bboyjordan @ 7:31 PM

Problem25- Maybe Fermat primes are infinte?

Show that \displaystyle \lim_{n\to +\infty}{\sigma_{-1}(2^{2^n}+1)}=1.
Solution. For every positive integer \displaystyle m=\prod_{1\le i\le \omega(m)}{p_i^{\alpha_i}} we have by definition \sigma_{-1}(m)=\displaystyle \sum_{d\mid m}{d^{-1}}=\prod_{1\le i\le \omega(m)}{\left(\sum_{0\le j \le \alpha_i}{p^{-j}}\right)}= \prod_{1\le i\le \omega(m)}{\frac{p-p^{-\alpha_i}}{p-1}}.

It means that for m=2^{2^n}+1 we have \sigma_{-1}(2^{2^n}+1)=\displaystyle \prod_{p_i\mid 2^{2^n}+1}{\frac{p_i-p_i^{-\alpha_i}}{p_i-1}} < \prod_{p_i\mid 2^{2^n}+1}{\frac{p_i}{p_i-1}}= \prod_{p_i\mid 2^{2^n}+1}{\left(1+\frac{1}{p_i-1}\right)}.

Note now that if a prime p_i \mid 2^{2^n}+1 then \text{ord}_{p_i}=2^{n+1}; but since \text{ord}_{p_i}(2)\mid \varphi(p_i)=p_i-1 then there exists a positive integer k_i>0 such that p_i=k_i2^{n+1}+1.

Also this trivial inequality holds: 2^{(n+1)2^n}>2^{2^n}+1=\displaystyle \prod_{p_i\mid 2^{2^n}+1}{p_i^{\upsilon_{p_i}(2^{2^n}+1)}} \ge \prod_{1\le i\le \omega(2^{2n}+1)}{p_i}> 2^{(n+1)\omega(2^{2^n}+1)}: so \omega(2^{2^n}+1)<2^n.

Summing up, \sigma_{-1}(2^{2^n}+1)<\displaystyle \prod_{1\le i\le \omega(2^{2^n}+1)}{\left(1+\frac{1}{p_i-1}\right)} = \displaystyle \prod_{1\le i\le \omega(2^{2^n}+1)}{\left(1+\frac{1}{k_i2^{n+1}}\right)} \le \prod_{1\le i\le \omega(2^{2^n}+1)}{\left(1+\frac{1}{i2^{n+1}}\right)}.

Extendig this product, we have \sigma_{-1}(2^{2^n}+1)< \displaystyle \sum_{0\le i\le \omega(2^{2^n}+1)}\left(\frac{1}{2^{i(n+1)}}\left(\sum_{1\le x_1<x_2<\ldots<x_i\le \omega(2^{2^n}+1)}{\frac{1}{x_1x_2\ldots x_i}}\right) \right) \displaystyle < \sum_{0\le i\le 2^n}\left(\frac{1}{2^{i(n+1)}}\left(\sum_{1\le x_1<x_2<\ldots<x_i\le 2^n}{\frac{1}{x_1x_2\ldots x_i}}\right) \right) < \displaystyle \sum_{0\le i\le 2^n}\left(\frac{1}{2^{i(n+1)}}\left(\sum_{1\le x_1\le x_2\le \ldots\le x_i\le 2^n}{\frac{1}{x_1x_2\ldots x_i}} \right)\right)
\displaystyle = \displaystyle \sum_{0\le i\le 2^n}\left(\frac{1}{2^{i(n+1)}}\left(\sum_{1\le j\le 2^n}{j^{-1}} \right)^i\right).

For every integer y\ge 2 it’s also true that \displaystyle \sum_{1\le j\le y}{j^{-1}}<1+\int_1^y{x^{-1}dx}=1+\ln(y).

Then we can say that there exists a positive constant C>0 such that \displaystyle \sum_{1\le j\le 2^n}{j^{-1}}< Cn.

Turning back to our problem, we proved that \displaystyle \sigma_{-1}(2^{2^n}+1)<\displaystyle \sum_{0\le i\le 2^n}\left(\frac{1}{2^{i(n+1)}}\left(\sum_{1\le j\le 2^n}{j^{-1}} \right)^i\right) \displaystyle < \sum_{0\le i\le 2^n}{\left(\frac{Cn}{2^{n+1}}\right)^i} \displaystyle< \sum_{0\le i\le \infty}{\left(\frac{Cn}{2^{n+1}}\right)^i}= \displaystyle \frac{2^{n+1}}{2^{n+1}-Cn}.

Now since for every \epsilon>0 the following inequality \displaystyle 2^{n+1}\left(1-\frac{1}{1+\epsilon} \right)>Cn holds definitively, then we finished, indeed:

\displaystyle \lim_{n\to +\infty}\sigma_{-1}(2^{2^n}+1)< \displaystyle \frac{2^{n+1}}{2^{n+1}-C\ln(n)} < 1+\epsilon. []

Advertisement

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.